Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted they do not wish to press the writ petition. The court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed; liberty granted to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40485 of 2022
Petitioner :- Rajesh Khanna Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahender Pal Singh Yadav,Mani Bhushan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the State-respondent.
At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the he does not want to press this writ petition and it may be dismissed as such, with liberty to file press.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with the leave as prayed for.
No order as to costs.
Order Date :- 15.2.2023 Dev/-
Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Khanna
State Of U P
3 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
