This court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jahida Begum and others as not pressed, observing that the cause for filing had ceased to exist as the impugned property had been put to auction.
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5038 of 2023
Petitioner :- Jahida Begum And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Mohan Pandey,Om Prakash Katiyar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Praneet Kumar Srivastava,Satish Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Praneet Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and learned Standing counsel for the State-respondent.
Learned counsel for the bank submits that the acquired property has been put for auction on 24.1.2023.
In view of the above, the cause for filing this writ petition is no more survives, as the property in question has already been put to auction.
In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that this writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed.
The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 14.2.2023 Dev/-
Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jahida Begum And 8 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
