Sri Praveen Kumar Tiwari, counsel for petitioners, withdrew the petition without pressing it, intending to seek appropriate remedy from the concerned respondent where the matter is pending, with no objection from the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34438 of 2022
Petitioner :- Bahadur Alias Bahadur And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Awanish Kumar Shukla,Dharmendra Kumar Chaubey
Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Azad Rai
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Praveen Kumar Tiwari, holding brief of Sri Dharmendra Kumar Chaubey, learned counsel for the petitioners, after making submissions to some extent, states that he does not wish to press the petition and that the petitioners would avail the appropriate legal remedy before the concerned respondent where the matter is stated to be pending.
Sri L.K. Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents has no objection.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 24.3.2023 Aditya
(Dr. Y. K. Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Bahadur Alias Bahadur And Another
State Of U.P.
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
