Petitioner's PIL was dismissed as no inquiry was conducted by the District Judge, though petitioners were advised to avail other remedies if aggrieved.
Petition dismissed; liberty granted to take appropriate remedy if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 9410 of 2012
Petitioner :- Adhivakta Sangharsh Samiti Pratapgarh Respondent :- Hon Ble High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Thr.R.G.And Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- H.G.S.Parihar,Anu Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Mehrotra,Manish Kumar
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Sri Anu pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri V.P. Nag, learned Addl. C.S.C. and Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel for the High Court are present.
Heard and perused the records.
Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, Advocate, on the basis of writteninstructions, states that no inquiry has been conducted in the matter by the District Judge.
In view of the statement made by Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, this petition is dismissed.
If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to him.
Consign to records.
( Subhash Vidyarthi, J. ) ( Ramesh Sinha, J. )
Order Date :- 3.2.2023 A.Nigam
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Adhivakta Sangharsh Samiti Pratapgarh
Hon'ble High Court of Judicature At Allahabad
Ramesh Sinha
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
