The Chief General Manager Telcom U.P. Lucknow v. R.K.Bajpai
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed to quash a Central Administrative Tribunal order. Petitioner absent; petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
Writ petition filed to quash a Central Administrative Tribunal order. Petitioner absent; petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2001562 of 2001
Petitioner :- The Chief General Manager Telcom U.P. Lucknow Respondent :- R.K.Bajpai Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- S.B.Pandey,Rajeev Kumar Sinha
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. However, Shri Rajeev Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel for the respondent is reported to be out of station.
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 15.01.2001 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in O.A. No.380 of 1999 (R.K. Bajpai & Others Vs. Union of India & Others) as contained in Annexure -6 to the writ petition so far it directs that if during the pendency of this Original Application any recovery is made from the applicant/opposite party(s), the applicant/opposite party(s) is entitled to get back the said amount within the period of three months from the date of receipt of this order;
(ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite party not to give effect to the impugned judgment and order contained in Annexure -6 to the writ petition."
Since none is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 1.2.2023 Anand Sri./-
Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
The Chief General Manager Telcom U.P. Lucknow
R.K. Bajpai
Ramesh Sinha
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court