This Hon'ble Court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation as infructuous because the petition had lost its efficacy. No substantive relief was granted.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; consigned to records.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 5918 of 2010
Petitioner :- Jagdish Kumar Gautam Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of North Railway And Anr.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar
Counsel for Respondent :- Manik Sinha,Amita Srivastava,Ashok Kumar Verma,Asit Kumar Chaturvedi,Devesh Chandra Pathak,Pankaj Srivastava
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Heard Sri Ajeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the respondent-Pollution Board, and Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for the Union of India, and perused the record.
From the prayer made in the present P.I.L. it appears that the same has lost its efficacy. The petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Consign to records.
( Subhash Vidyarthi, J. ) ( Ramesh Sinha, J. )
Order Date :- 3.2.2023 A.Nigam
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jagdish Kumar Gautam
Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of North Railway And Anr.
Subhash Vidyarthi
Ramesh Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
