This court consigned a PIL to the record. A coordinate bench had already addressed the involved issue, rendering the instant filing unnecessary for judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 18055 of 2021
Petitioner :- In Reunruly Behaviourandbreach Of Protocol During Awadh Bar Respondent :- Awadh Bar Association Lucknow Counsel for Petitioner :- Suo Moto,Anand Mani Tripathi,Arvind Kumar Pathak,Dr. V.K. Singh,Lalit Kishore Tiwari,Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui,Sanjeev Kumar Pandey,Sushil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Lalta Prasad Misra,Aasif Razzaque Khan,Akhilesh Kumar Kalra,Amrendra Nath Tripathi,Avinash Chandra,Girdhari Lal Yadav,Manoj Kumar Mishra,S M Singh Royekwar,Shree Chand Mishra Inpers,Srideep Chatterjee
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Sri Akhilesh Kumar Kalra, learned counsel for the respondents is reported to be ill.
Sri Indrajeet Shukla, learned Chief Standing Counsel, Sri Ashif Razzaque Khan, learned counsel for the Bar Council of U.P., Sri Srideep Chatterjee, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel for the High Court are present.
From a perusal of the order dated 24.08.2021 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court it transpires that the issue involved in the instant Public Interest Litigation has already been addressed to.
In view of above, the instant PIL is consigned to record.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 1.2.2023 Pradeep/-
Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
In Reunruly Behaviourandbreach Of Protocol During Awadh Bar
Awadh Bar Association Lucknow
Ramesh Sinha
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
