In habeas corpus writ petition No. 379 of 2023, the single-judge bench dismissed the petition as not pressed, in view of the petitioner's counsel stating no desire to proceed.
None; petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:156970
Court No. - 79
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 379 of 2023
Petitioner :- Radhika @ Rinki And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Tripathi,Sheshdhar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sanjay Mishra
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Praveen Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioners states that petitioners do not want to press this petition.
In view of above submission, present habeas corpus writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This order has been passed in presence of Sri Anil Kumar Shukla, learned counsel on behalf of detenue and Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 to 8.
Order Date :- 4.8.2023 P.P.
Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhika @ Rinki And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 7 Others
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
