In Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 281 of 2023, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's counsel's failure to comply with repeated directions regarding service of notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:156456
Court No. - 79
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 281 of 2023 Petitioner :- Satyam Singh And Another Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Rpasad Kushwaha,Arvind Singh Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present on behalf of petitioners to press this petition.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
This Court vide order dated 28.03.2023, issued notices to respondent nos. 4 to 6 but learned counsel for the petitioners has not taken steps. Again, time was granted to the petitioners, vide order dated 05.05.2023 but in spite of repeated directions, learned counsel for the petitioners has not taken steps for service of notice upon respondent nos. 4 to 6.
In view of above, the habeas corpus writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 4.8.2023 sailesh
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Satyam Singh And Another
The State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Vipin Chandra Dixit
Sailesh Prajapati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
