Habeas corpus writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn because the petitioner successfully produced the corpus during the pendency of the petition which returned to the husband.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1008 of 2022
Petitioner :- Reena And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pratibha Vohra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Ms. Pratibha Vohra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that purpose of filing the present habeas corpus petition has been solved as the corpus has returned to the company of her husband i.e. petitioner no. 2 during pendency of present petition. Thus, it is prayed that she may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 28.1.2023 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Reena And Another
State Of U.P.
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
