High Court dismissed criminal revision No. 263 of 2022 filed by a juvenile, holding the petition infructuous due to the revisionist's acquittal by the trial court.
Revision dismissed; delay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 263 of 2022
Revisionist :- X (Juvenile ) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Nand Lal Yadav,Prem Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Prem Chand, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present revision has become infructuous due to acquittal of the revisionist by the trial court.
Delay condonation application is dismissed as not pressed.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 24.4.2023 MAA/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
X (Juvenile)
State Of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
