The High Court dismissed the criminal revision as infructuous because the revisionist was already convicted on 01.07.2022 based on a confession before the Juvenile Justice Board, rendering the present challenge devoid of merit.
The revision was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1741 of 2015
Revisionist :- Amzad Alias Natha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Anand Kumar Singh,Manish Soni Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Learned A.G.A. pointed out that the revisionist has been convicted by the order dated 01.07.2022 on the basis of confession made by him before the Juvenile Justice Board, therefore, the present revision has become infructuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.4.2023 MAA/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Amzad Alias Natha
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
