The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the criminal revision as infructuous on the ground that the revisionist had attained majority and released the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2796 of 2022
Revisionist :- X And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi,Anubhav Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the revisionists and Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the revisionists submits that the present criminal revision has became infructuous due to release of the revisionist after attaining the age of majority.
In view of the above, the present criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.4.2023 Ishan
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision for a minor needs to be adjourned once the minor attains majority.
X And Another
State Of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Ishan Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
