In this Criminal Revision, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the revisionist, allowing him to file a fresh petition as per law, without citing specific case law or substantive legal issues to resolve.
Revision dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file fresh petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:233393
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1228 of 2023
Revisionist :- Atul Tyagi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Awadhesh Kumar Mishra,Sanjay Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he wants to withdraw the instant criminal revision with liberty to file fresh petition as provided under law. Therefore, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
The instant revision is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
Certified copy of the impugned judgment and order shall be returned to the learned counsel for the revisionist after retaining a photo copy of the same to be kept on record.
Order Date :- 8.12.2023 Shivani
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANI SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Atul Tyagi
State Of U.P.
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
