Sami Alam v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Criminal Revision was disposed of with a direction that the revisionist should file an application before the appropriate authority for the release of his vehicle. The court observed that the remedy for vehicle release lies with the District Magistrate/Commissioner.
What did the court decide?
Directed the revisionist to move the appropriate authority for release of his vehicle.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:233227
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5683 of 2023
Revisionist :- Sami Alam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Irfan Raza Khan,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Heard learned Counsel for revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 08.08.2023 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat in Case Crime No.345 of 2021 (State v. Ravindra), under Sections 3, 5, 8 of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Chhaprauli, District Baghpat. By the impugned order, his application for release of his vehicle has been rejected by the learned court below on the ground that the appropriate remedy lies with the District Magistrate/Commissioner.
In case the revisionist moves an application before the appropriate authority for releasing of his vehicle, the same may be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid observation, the criminal revision is disposed of .
Coram
Nand Prabha Shukla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/5683/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court