Revisionist seeking criminal revision argued that since charges were already framed, the petition became infructuous. The single judge accepted this submission and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:233004
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2613 of 2023
Revisionist :- Ashish Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Kuldeep Kumar Gupta,Dhirendra Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pusp Raj Singh,Rajesh Singh
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A. for the State.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the opposite parties states that the charges have already been framed. Hence, this revision has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.12.2023 Shivani
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANI SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashish Yadav
State of U.P.
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
