Petitioner sought to quash an FIR and seek non-arrest direction. Being already arrested, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6170 of 2023
Petitioner :- Preeti And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satpal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Satpal, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and perused the records.
The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned first information report dated 11.02.2023 registered as Case Crime No. 21 of 2023, under Section 363 I.P.C. Police Station- Madanpur, District Deoria and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned first information report.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has already been arrested and the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.5.2023 Pratima
Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Preeti And Another
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Birla
Surendra Singh-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
