Allowed

Mohd Sharif v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC14 Dec 2023BAIL/47351/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 47351 of 2023, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the applicant Mohd Sharif. The court allowed the application on the ground of parity, noting that a co-accused with an identical role had already been released on bail. The applicant was ordered to appear before the trial court and follow standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties, subject to conditions against tampering and appearance.

Mohd Sharif Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236922

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47351 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Mohd Sharif Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Wajid Ali,Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri S.P. Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.250 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 341, 342, 307, 109, 504 I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police StationSheeshgarh, District- Bareilly, during the pendency of trial.

¶9

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused person, Akaram has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 13.10.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.43740 of 2023. The applicant is languishing in jail since 21.8.2023, having no criminal history to his credit. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶10

The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However, the aforesaid factual aspects of parity to the co-accused and of no criminal history of the applicant, have not been disputed by him.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and also taking into consideration the judgment of the Apex Court passed in the case of Paras Ram Vishnoi vs. The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, MANU/SCOR/22410/2021 and the judgment of this Court passed in the case of Nanha S/o Nabhan Kha vs. State of U.P., 1993 Cri.L.J. 938 , and without expressing any opinion on

¶12

the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail on the ground of parity. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.

¶13

Let the applicant- Mohd Sharif involved in aforementioned case crime number be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.

¶14

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶15

(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶17

(v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶19

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶20

It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion on the testimony of the witnesses.

¶21

Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Vikas

¶22

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶23

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd Sharif v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Sharif v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahid @ Sem Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Anita Gupta Vs State of U.P. and Another

Amarik and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jarisa Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ajmat and 4 Others Vs State of U.P.

Naim Vs State of U.P. and Another