In Cr. Misc. A.M. No. 13489 of 2023, the Allahabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to an applicant charging arson and dowry-related offenses. The bail was allowed relying on Sushila Aggarwal, subject to standard conditions.
Grant of anticipatory bail until the conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236569
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13489 of 2023
Applicant :- Jarisa Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Avesh Pratap Singh,Amit Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
circumstances, she could not attend the Court, as such, nonbailable warrants have been issued against her.
i. that the applicant shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court;
iv. that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial; v. that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness; vi. that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant facing charges under Sections 498-A and other IPC provisions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)Relied on¶14
Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)-2020 SCC online SC 98 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jarisa
State Of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
