Disposed

Naim v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC14 Dec 2023ABAIL/13840/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. No interference was made out. The applicant was directed to surrender within one month. If a regular bail application is filed later, it must be decided per the Satender Kumar Antil guidelines. No coercive action is permitted during the one-month period.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action against the applicant for one month from today or until surrender, whichever is earlier.

Naim Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236721

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13840 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Naim Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Singh Tomar,Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Rajiv Sisodia, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Pranshu Kumar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.470 of 2023, under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kiratpur, District Bijnor.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Ravi Kant

¶14

(Krishan Pahal, J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Naim v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naim v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahid @ Sem Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Anita Gupta Vs State of U.P. and Another

Amarik and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jarisa Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ajmat and 4 Others Vs State of U.P.

Puneet Pratap Singh Alias Puchchu and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others