Disposed

Ajmat and 4 Others v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC14 Dec 2023ABAIL/13819/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. without granting interim protection, directing the applicants to surrender within one month and file a regular bail application to be decided per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender within one month to file regular bail application; no coercive action during this period.

Ajmat and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236749

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13819 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Ajmat And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Sushil Dubey, learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri Pranshu Kumar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.324 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 336, 504, 427 I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Simbhawali, District Hapur.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Ajmat, Arif, Rais, Mohd. Talib Ali and Mohd. Zaid, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date :- 14.12.2023

¶14

Ravi Kant

¶15

(Krishan Pahal, J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ajmat and 4 Others v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajmat and 4 Others v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahid @ Sem Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Anita Gupta Vs State of U.P. and Another

Amarik and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jarisa Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Naim Vs State of U.P. and Another

Puneet Pratap Singh Alias Puchchu and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others