The Allahabad High Court dismissed the criminal revision as infructuous because the revisionist had already been convicted by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:48337
Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 802 of 2022
Revisionist :- Abhishek Trivedi (X) Under The Gaurdianship Of Father Anoop Trivedi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Chhaya Tripathi,Pradeep Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State.
Learned counsel for the revisionist, at the very outset, submitted that the present revision has become infructuous as the revisionist has been convicted by the trial court.
In view of the above, the present revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.7.2023 Shravan
Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Renu Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
