Allowed

Sunil Kumar Shukla v. Smt.Pooja and Anr.

Allahabad HC25 Jul 2023/313/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a Criminal Misc. Application seeking withdrawal of a criminal revision. It further disposed of the pending criminal revision filed under section 19(4) of the Family Court Act against an order regarding maintenance under section 125 Cr.P.C., dismissing it as withdrawn after the parties settled amicably via a family court order.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Misc. Application allowed; Criminal Revision dismissed as withdrawn.

Sunil Kumar Shukla Vs Smt.Pooja and Anr. — Maintenance and Alimony | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:48662

¶2

Court No. - 29

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 313 of 2019

¶4

Revisionist :- Sunil Kumar Shukla Opposite Party :- Smt.Pooja And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajendra Pratap Singh,Ajai Kumar Gupta,Surendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Vinod Mishra

¶5

Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.

¶6

Criminal Misc. Application No.1A/10 of 2023

¶7

Heard Sri Surendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Vinod Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party nos.1 & 2, and perused the material available on record.

¶8

This application for withdrawal of the revision moved on behalf of the revisionist Sunil Kumar Shukla.

¶9

It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that revisionist and opposite party no.1 have settled the disputed amicably by means of settlement/compromised entered between the parties. Accordingly, a joint compromise was filed on 16.05.2023 in the court of Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Sultanpur and the matter has been settled between the parties by the order dated 21.05.2023 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Sultanpur. Copy of order dated 21.05.2023 is annexed as annexure no.2 to the application. In terms of compromise the revisionist has paid Rs.5,00,000/- to the opposite party nos.1 & 2 as full and final payment of maintenance allowance.

¶10

Learned counsel for the opposite party nos.1 & 2 agreed with the aforesaid facts.

¶11

In the aforesaid circumstances, the application is allowed.

¶12

Order on Revision

¶13

Heard Sri Surendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Vinod Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party nos.1 & 2, and perused the material available on record. This criminal revision under section 19(4) of Family Court Act, has been filed against the judgment and order dated 05.02.2019 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, District Sultanpur, in Misc. Case No.496 of 2015 filed by the opposite party nos.1& 2 against the revisionist, under section 125 Cr.P.C.

¶14

¶15

Learned counsel for the opposite party nos.1 & 2 agreed with the aforesaid facts and states that he has no objection, in case, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

In the aforesaid circumstances, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawal.

¶17

(Renu Agarwal,J.)

¶18

Order Date :- 25.7.2023/VKG

¶19

Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sunil Kumar Shukla v. Smt.Pooja and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Shukla v. Smt.Pooja and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Revisionist Is Minor 'a' Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Abhishek Trivedi (X) Under the Gaurdianship of Father Anoop Trivedi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow and 3 Others

Pradeep Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jarrar Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Smt.Israttulnisha @ Nuri and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Tara Chandra @ Tara Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another