This court dismissed a criminal revision arising out of Court No. 29 as infructuous without engaging in further reasoning.
Revision dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:47842
Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1177 of 2016
Revisionist :- Pradeep Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Nadeem Murtaza Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Rakesh Chandra Rastogi
Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.
Shri Anjani Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the matter has become infructuous.
The revision is dismissed as infructuous.
(Renu Agarwal,J.)
Order Date :- 21.7.2023 Nadeem
Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Pradeep Singh
State of U.P.
Another
Renu Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
