Petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous due to an earlier order representing his claim. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly, discharging any interim orders.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1281 of 2022
Petitioner :- Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinava Krishna Srivastava,Dharmendra Singh Chauhan
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Radhey Shyam Dwivedi, learned Advocate for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that with the order dated 24.09.2022 passed on the representation moved by the petitioner, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
Sri Abhinav Krishna Srivastava, learned Advocate for the respondent- Nagar Nigam also accepts the said submission.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 14.11.2022 P Kesari
Digitally signed by PRACHI KESARWANI Date: 2022.11.15 10:34:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pratap Singh
State Of U P
Sunita Agarwal
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
