Santosh Kumar Chaubey v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the petition despite an appearance notice during the pending period.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the petition despite an appearance notice during the pending period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27946 of 2022
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Chaubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anupam Shyam Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Dixit
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
No one appears to press the present petition.
On the last occasion, the matter was adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 11.11.2022
Harshita
Digitally signed by HARSHITA Date: 2022.11.11 18:09:19 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Kumar Chaubey
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court