High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous due to efflux of time, noting no amendment under Article 226 was pressed in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8947 of 2004
Petitioner :- Yashoda Devi Respondent :- D.J. Pilibhit And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- V.D. Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravindra Singh
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
None appears for the petitioner even in revised call. However, Shri Satish Mohan Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel, is present for the State-respondents.
By the present writ petition, the order of Civil Court has been challenged. Therefore, the petition should have been filed/converted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Neither any such amendment application has been filed nor is any one present to press the petition.
It appears that by efflux of time the petition has become infructuous that is why none has appeared to press the petition.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any stands vacated.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the District Judge concerned for compliance and necessary action.
Order Date :- 9.12.2022
S.Verma
Digitally signed by SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA Date: 2022.12.14 17:27:00 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Yashoda Devi
D.J. Pilibhit
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
