A writ petition filed in 2001 was dismissed by a single judge of the Allahabad High Court for want of prosecution due to lack of appearance and efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16065 of 2001
Petitioner :- Abdul Mazid Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner Chitrakoot Dham Banda And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Punit Kumar Gupta,V.B. Rao Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
None appears for the petitioner even in revised call. However, Shri Jitendra Narain Rai, learned A.C.S.C. is present for the State.
The matter pertains to the year 2001, it seems that by efflux of time either cause of action is no more surviving or for any other reason the petition has rendered infructuous. That is why none has appeared to press the petition.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 9.12.2022 S.Verma
Digitally signed by SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA Date: 2022.12.12 17:24:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Mazid
Addl. Commissioner Chitrakoot Dham Banda
Others
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
