The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance and failure to comply with an earlier order regarding an amendment application filed on 20.10.2022.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35407 of 1999
Petitioner :- Gayatri Devi Respondent :- Spl.Judge E.C.Actbasti And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Chandra Naik Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kshitij Shailendra,P.P. Chaudhery,S.K. Lal
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
From perusal of the record it appears that the order dated 20.10.2022, in respect filing of amendment application, has not been complied with.
Today none appears for the petitioner even in the revised call. Sri Abhay Misra holding brief of Sri Kshitij Shailendra, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.12.2022 Shahroz
Digitally signed by SHAHROJ ALAM Date: 2022.12.09 17:17:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Gayatri Devi
Spl.Judge E.C.Absti
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
