The Writ Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear when called upon twice on different dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33397 of 1999
Petitioner :- Digvijai Narain Tewari Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- K.M.Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahendra Kumar Agrawal,Narayan Dutt Shukla
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
On 20.10.2022 since none was present on behalf of the petitioner, the Court had observed that interim order, if any, stands vacated and the case was adjourned.
Today again none appears for the petitioner even in the revised call. Sri J.N. Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Sri N.D. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents are present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 9.12.2022 Shahroz
Digitally signed by SHAHROJ ALAM Date: 2022.12.09 15:56:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Digvijai Narain Tewari
State Of U.P.
Umesh Chandra Sharma
Shahroz Alam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
