Radhey Shyam and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the writ petition has become infructuous and dismissed accordingly (para 6).
Held that the writ petition has become infructuous and dismissed accordingly (para 6).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7752 of 2022
Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Vinay Kumar Mishra, counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition has become infructuous.
It is dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 29.3.2022 CS/-
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by CHANDAN SINGH Date: 2022.03.31 10:15:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhey Shyam And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court