The High Court dismissed the present writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the matter on behalf of the petitioners.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18966 of 2022
Petitioner :- Vikash Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Mohan Asthana
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
No one has come forward to press the present writ petition on behalf of the petitioners.
Sri Sagar Srivastava learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Krishna Mohan Asthana learned Advocate for the respondent bank is present.
On the instructions received by the counsel for the respondent bank, it is submitted that even the order dated 12.9.2022 passed by this Court in the present writ petition has not been complied with.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.11.2022 Brijesh
Digitally signed by BRIJESH KUMAR Date: 2022.11.10 18:39:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vikash Kumar And Another
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
