The Court dismissed a writ petition filed over eight years after the impugned orders were passed, holding that the petition was barred by delay and laches.
The writ petition challenging the impugned orders dated June 4 and June 11, 2013, is dismissed due to delay and laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 6
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 27946 of 2021
Ashok Rana .....Petitioner Through :- Mr. H.S. Chaurasiya, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dhrub Narayan Kharwar, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondent
Through :- Mr. Rajeev Singh, Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 5, Mr. J.N. Maurya, Advocate, for respondent no. 6 (through V.C.)
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 07.01.2022 P.Sri./Manish Himwan
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed after a delay of more than eight years challenging earlier orders can be permitted despite the delay and laches.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Rana
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
