A writ petition challenging termination of petitioner's Home Guard services due to forged appointment documents was dismissed. The Court held that since the ground of forged documents was not denied, the order could not be quashed for non-service of notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5038 of 2022
Petitioner :- Zahid Ansari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Chandra Srivastava,Ashok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
passed an order dated 08.12.2021 whereby services of petitioner have been terminated.
submits that impugned order is liable to be sustained and present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Order Date :- 9.5.2022 YK
Digitally signed by YASHWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.05.10 17:18:30 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging termination of services on grounds of forged documents can be allowed for non-service of notice.
Whether the High Court can interfere when the ground of termination (forged certificate) is expressly denied by the petitioner.
Zahid Ansari
State Of U.P.
District Commandant Home Guards, Deoria
Respondent-2
Respondent-3
Respondent-4
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
