Court rejected anticipatory bail application filed by Asad Ali and Mumtaz Ali in connection with FIR under Sections 504, 506 IPC and U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, holding no exceptional circumstances existed.
Anticipatory bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17129 of 2021
Applicant :- Asad Ali @ Mohd. Asad Ali And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Prabha Shanker Mishra,Prakhar Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jaishankar Prasad Tyagi,Lallan Chaubey
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
bail is liable to be rejected.
Order Date :- 7.5.2022 YK
Digitally signed by YASHWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.05.08 17:40:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is warranted in the present criminal proceedings.
Whether exceptional circumstances exist to warrant interference with the bail application.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of EnforcementExplained¶9
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Asad Ali
Mumtaz Ali
Rajeev Misra
Yashwant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
