Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear in court to press the application, despite the presence of the State Advocate General.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16811 of 2021
Applicant :- Ravindra Kumar Patel And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 7.5.2022 YK
Digitally signed by YASHWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.05.08 17:41:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravindra Kumar Patel And 3 Others
Rajeev Misra
Anant Sathe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
