Single judge held that petitioner, not being a party to a specific Special Appeal, is not entitled to the relief granted therein, being restricted to those short of one mark.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4854 of 2022
Petitioner :- Pankaj Chauhan Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Javed Raza Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
The petitioner has approached this court praying for grant of relief as per judgment passed in Special Appeal (Defective) No. 343 of 2021 (Abhishek Srivastava and 14 others vs. State of U.P. and others).
In the aforesaid judgment special appeal court has clearly held that the benefit of the judgment shall only be given to the appellant and the writ petitioner if they are short of one mark and not to others. Petitioner has not claimed that he was either the petitioner or appellant in the special appeal aforesaid. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid Division Bench judgment no relief can be granted to the petitioner.
The petition is accordingly, dismissed .
Order Date :- 7.4.2022 Rohit
Digitally signed by ROHIT DAS Date: 2022.04.11 13:24:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pankaj Chauhan
The State Of U.P.
2 Others
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
