The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a writ petition as infructuous. Counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioner's educational documents were verified and a report sent by the University to the District Basic Education Officer. The petitioner did not dispute this.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3927 of 2022
Petitioner :- Dheeraj Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Atul Tej Kulshrestha,Vivek Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Shri Atul Tej Kulshrestha,learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.2 and 3 has made a statement that educational documents of the petitioner have been verified and report has been sent by the University to the District Basic Education OfÏcer, Aligarh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the same.
In view of the above the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.4.2022 Atul kr. sri.
Digitally signed by ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.04.07 14:44:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dheeraj Kumar
State Of U.P.
2 Others
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
