This order dismisses a PIL filed regarding tender allotment for road construction. The court found the petition filed over a year late, lacked disclosed credentials, and was motivated, leading to dismissal.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 23
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
*******
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 811 of 2022
Ram Surat Patel
.....Petitioner
Through :- Mr. Piyush Kant Vishwakarma, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondents
Through :- Ms. Meenakshi Singh, State Law Officer for respondents no. 1 and 2, Mr. Bijendra Kumar Mishra and Mr. Gaurav Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocates for respondent no. 3
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
2 WPIL No. 811 of 2022
more than a year after the work was allotted which was to be completed within a period of two months, is motivated.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 04.05.2022 Manish Himwan/Kuldeep
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by MANISH HIMWAN Date: 2022.05.09 15:10:40 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a PIL regarding allotment of tenders filed more than a year after the work was allotted, without disclosing credentials, can be maintained.
Ram Surat Patel
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
