The Allahabad High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking recovery of illegally possessed land. The court refused to entertain the claim, noting the predecessor-in-interest never raised the issue for over six decades after the industry was established.
None. The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 29
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 10293 of 2022
Kalai
.....Petitioner
Through :- Mr. Ram Krishna Mishra, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondents Through :- Mr. A.K. Roy, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondents No. 3
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 27.04.2022 Manish Himwan/Kuldeep
Whether the order is speaking : Yes Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by MANISH HIMWAN Date: 2022.05.11 11:26:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for recovery of illegally possessed land can be entertained when the predecessor-in-interest failed to raise the issue for over six decades.
Whether the present petition should be dismissed on the ground of prolonged inaction.
Kalai
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
