Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
PIL regarding alleged illegal mining in Varanasi disposed of when respondents assured conclusion of proceedings within three months.
PIL regarding alleged illegal mining in Varanasi disposed of when respondents assured conclusion of proceedings within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 19
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 657 of 2022
Santosh Kumar
.....Petitioner
Through :- Mr. Vivek Kumar Pal, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Rajeev Singh, Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 04.05.2022 Amit Mishra
2 WPIL No. 657 of 2022
Whether the order is speaking : No
Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.05.06 14:09:48 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Kumar
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court