The bench allowed the intra-court appeal by following a precedent (Special Appeal No.343 of 2021) where identical issues were decided, without recording fresh reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.13
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 445 of 2021 (In Writ-A No.14763 of 2021)
Appellant :- Neha Richhariya Respondent :- State of U.P. and another
Counsel for Appellant :- Mr. Ashish Kumar Dubey, Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Ajay Prakash Paul, State Law Officer for respondents
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal,Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
The present intra-court appeal has been filed against the order dated July 22, 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant has referred to a Division Bench judgment of this Court passed in Special Appeal Defective No.343 of 2021 (Abhishek Srivastava and 14 others vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) whereby a bunch of Special Appeals raising identical issues were decided. The submission is that the issue raised in the present appeal is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment.
Learned counsel for the respondents has fairly conceded the aforesaid position.
For the reasons recorded in Abhishek Srivastava and 14 others' case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms.
Date :- 3.1.2022 Rakesh/AHA
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Special Appeal Defective No.343 of 2021 (Abhishek Srivastava and 14 others vs. State of U.P. and 2 others)Followed¶9
Neha Richhariya
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
