The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a transfer application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite multiple adjournments and calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 239 of 2018
Applicant :- Shivam Gurjar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Singh Sengar,Thakur Prasad Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arjun Singh Solanki,Rajiv Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
None responds the call on behalf of applicant.
Heard learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It is informed that opposite party nos. 3 to 6 are proforma parties.
Perusal of the record reveals that this case was listed on 22.02.2022 and 07.03.2022. On 07.03.2022, the case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the applicant and today also none appears on behalf of applicant.
Accordingly, this Transfer Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.3.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.03.10 14:28:54 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shivam Gurjar
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
