Rashid and Others v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear. The petition, pending since 2010, was dismissed as infructuous due to the efflux of time.
Petitioner failed to appear. The petition, pending since 2010, was dismissed as infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 67810 of 2010
Petitioner :- Rashid And Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
None responds the call on behalf of petitioners.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This petition is pending since 2010 and has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 10.3.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.03.10 14:29:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rashid And Others
State of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court