The court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite being called out in the revised list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 193 of 2019
Applicant :- Syed Najam Ullah Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Nazrul Islam Jafri Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mukti Nath Dwivedi,Suhel Ahmad Azmi
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of applicant.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 and perused the record.
As learned counsel for the applicant is absent today, this Transfer Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.3.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.03.14 10:03:24 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Syed Najam Ullah
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
Abhishek Mandhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
