This one-line order dispatches a Habeas Corpus petition filed in 2010 as infructuous due to the efflux of time, dismissing it without elaborate analysis or reasoning.
Discharge of the petitioner is denied as the petition is dismissed due to lapse of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 70407 of 2010
Petitioner :- Santosh And Others Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Yusuf Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
None responds the call on behalf of petitioners.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This petition is pending since 2010 and has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.3.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.03.09 15:58:32 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Habeas Corpus petition filed in 2010 remains maintainable after a decade due to efflux of time.
Santosh And Others
The State Of U.P. And Others
Anil Kumar Ojha
Ved Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
