Najma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Criminal Revision No. 454 of 2022, decided 18.04.2022 by Rahul Chaturvedi, J. Protest petition by sister of the deceased (third party / rank outsider) against acceptance of police final report in a fatal road-accident FIR (Sections 279, 338, 304-A IPC; accident of 11.11.2019; FIR of 13.11.2019; final report No. 35/20 dated 28.02.2020) dismissed; CJM Baghpat order dated 01.11.2021 upheld; no interference warranted under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C.; protest petitioner held to be neither eyewitness nor in possession of credible information; revision dismissed as lacking merit. Counsel: Ashish Pandey for revisionist; G.A. for State.
What did the court decide?
The protest petition/application moved by the revisionist is based on conjectures, surmises and an imaginary story; she is neither an eyewitness to the incident nor has any credible information about it.