Uma Shankar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed due to loss of interest by the appellant and efflux of time, finding no illegality in the impugned conviction.
What the court decided
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1503 of 2000 Revisionist :- Uma Shankar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- S.K.Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Vinay Prakash Shahu, learned A.G.A. is present.
This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 26.07.2000 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge Firozabad in Criminal Appeal No. 16/1994 arising out of judgment and order dated 7.11.1994 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad in Criminal Case No. 1269/1994 convicting and sentencing the revisionist under Section 7/16 P.F.A. Act to six months rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/- or in default to also undergo 3 months simple imprisonment.
Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General submits that the present revision is of the year, 2000 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and orders passed by the courts below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Uma Shankar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1503/2000
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court