The court found the C.M. writ petition infructuous by efflux of time and dismissed it, while leaving open the option for the petitioner to file an appropriate application.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1191 of 2019
Petitioner :- Neelu Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Home And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Misra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers :-
"(i.) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari be issued quashing the impugned F.I.R. registered as Case Crime No. 432 of 2018, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 409 IPC, Police Station Mandhata, District Pratapgarh.
(ii) writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus be issued commanding the opp. parties to abstain from taking any coercive measures against them."
It appears that by efflux of time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, it is open for the petitioner to move an appropriate application within two months from today, if the matter survives.
It is made clear that if any consequential proceedings are initiated in pursuance of the impugned FIR, the parties are at liberty to take recourse to law.
(Mrs. Saroj Yadav, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 28.3.2022 Arun
Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR Date: 2022.03.29 17:36:13 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Neelu Devi
State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home And Ors.
Ramesh Sinha
Saroj Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
