Application for contempt proceedings was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the application, despite the respondent informing the court that the impugned order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 744 of 2018
Applicant :- Ravi Kumar Opposite Party :- Gaya Prasad Mishra And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Bal Krishna Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ashish Mishra,Laltaprasad Misra
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case called out.
None appears on behalf of the applicant to press the application.
Shri Mohit Jauhari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent informs that order of the writ Court has already been complied with.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution . Order Date :- 11.11.2022 KR
(Rajeev Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by RABINDRA KUMAR Date: 2022.11.11 17:11:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ravi Kumar
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
